Gaga gets protective over Viva Glam

Here at BHB, we are MAC Cosmetics addicts. We sing their praises regularly over twitter and I think the brand makes up half of my personal cosmetic collection. So, when MAC’s Viva Glam program announced there would be special edition Lady Gaga and Cyndi Lauper shades in early 2010, we were very excited.

Now that those original shades are due to be discontinued (why yes, I do have backups, I suggest you get some too) Gaga has lined up a new shade, Viva Glam Gaga 2.
I am not going to slam the colour, even if it isn’t as unique as the last one was, it seems like a very good wash-out-your-lips nude. Every girl needs a nude or five, and of course these ones help people who are living with or affected by HIV and AIDS.




But, I just cannot get over the outfit Gaga wore on Good Morning America to promote it!
I seriously did this at my computer:

I admit, I really cannot stand most of what she wears anyway and force myself to think like the parent of a troubled teen: “it’s an art form, and expression, she will grow out of it”, and I do get why she went with that outift, she was promoting safe sex, but that condom inspired suit was ridiculous! It looked dreadful! Not just because it is peach latex, but because it is shapeless. It just hangs off her instead of being form fitting, which lets face it, would have been a far more accurate representation.

And the whole “the universe needs to have a rebirth” shit? Yes our world is fucked up right now, but I do not need to be in a vessel for three days, I love myself! I’m awesome! But then, if I walked around with horns sprouting from my face like she does then I can’t say I would feel so good about myself either.

Bottom line, buy the lippy, be aware and protect yourself, but please ignore the “fashion” the person promoting it is wearing, and if you spot her on the street walk in the opposite direction, quickly! Her crazy might be catching.


Yours Venomously, BHB.

MAC Aids Fund

Source, Source, Source